Hybrid Expert-Augmented Active Learning for Enhanced Electronic Records Management in Uganda’s Wildlife Sector

Hybrid Expert-Augmented Active Learning

  • Habib Shehu Department of Information Technology & Systems, Kampala International University, Uganda
  • Sajid Saleem Department of Library and Information Science, Federal Polytechnic, Nasarawa, Nigeria
  • Vaithiyalingam Subramanian Manjula Department of Computer Science, Kampala International University, Uganda
  • Isa Ismail Ibrahim Department of Library & Information Science, International Islamic University, Gombak, Malaysia
Keywords: Active learning, hybrid expert-augmented active learning, wildlife electronic records management system, Conservation

Abstract

We propose a hybrid expert-augmented active learning framework to reformulate Uganda’s wildlife electronic records management system, addressing the critical challenges of data quality and decision-making efficiency in conservation efforts. The proposed method integrates a Bayesian neural network with human-in-the-loop annotation, dynamically prioritising uncertain records for expert validation while autonomously processing high-confidence data. The system consists of three core modules: an uncertainty-aware data ingestion layer that quantifies prediction reliability, a mobile-optimised expert interface for real-time annotation, and an adaptive training loop that incrementally refines the model using newly validated records. Moreover, the architecture substitutes conventional data pipelines by routing ambiguous inputs to human experts and archiving only machine-confident entries, thereby reducing noise in the central database. The implementation employs a Monte Carlo dropout transformer for robust uncertainty estimation and federated learning to aggregate distributed expert inputs without centralised data pooling. Unlike static systems, our approach establishes a closed-loop feedback mechanism between data quality and model performance, enabling continuous improvement in predictive accuracy and operational decision-making. The novelty lies in its context-aware annotation workflow and dynamic prioritisation of expert effort, which are tailored to the sparse and heterogeneous nature of wildlife data in resource-constrained environments. Field deployments demonstrate significant improvements in species identification accuracy and threat assessment reliability, highlighting the framework’s potential to transform electronic records management in conservation sectors globally.

References

Ahmadian, R., Ghatee, M., & Wahlström, J. (2024). Improved user identification through calibrated Monte Carlo

dropout. Knowledge-Based Systems.

Anderson, R. M., Connors, J. P. C., Cavallo, S. E., & Gianotti, A. S. (2024). Activating uncertainty: Scientific evidence

and environmental values in wildlife management. Geoforum.

Arablouei, R., Wang, Z., Bishop-Hurley, G. J., & Liu, J. (2023). Multimodal sensor data fusion for in-situ

classification of animal behavior using accelerometry and GNSS data. Smart Agricultural Technology.

Armstrong, D. P., & McCarthy, M. A. (2007). Big decisions and sparse data: Adapting scientific publishing to the

needs of practical conservation. Avian Conservation & Ecology.

Austen, G. E., Bindemann, M., Griffiths, R. A., & Roberts, D. L. (2018). Species identification by conservation

practitioners using online images: Accuracy and agreement between experts. PeerJ.

Bothmann, L., Wimmer, L., Charrakh, O., Weber, T., et al. (2023). Automated wildlife image classification: An active

learning tool for ecological applications. Ecological Informatics.

Bothmann, L., Wimmer, L., Charrakh, O., Weber, T., et al. (2023). Automated wildlife image classification: An active

learning tool for ecological applications. Ecological Informatics.

Chapron, G. (2015). Wildlife in the cloud: A new approach for engaging stakeholders in wildlife management. Ambio.

Dema, T., Brereton, M., & Roe, P. (2019). Designing participatory sensing with remote communities to conserve

endangered species. In Proceedings of.

Deng, C., Ji, X., Rainey, C., Zhang, J., & Lu, W. (2020). Integrating machine learning with human knowledge.

iScience.

Edwards, T., Jones, C. B., & Corcoran, P. (2022). Identifying wildlife observations on Twitter. Ecological Informatics.

Fergus, P., Chalmers, C., Longmore, S., & Wich, S. (2024). Harnessing artificial intelligence for wildlife conservation.

Conservation.

Gast, J., & Roth, S. (2018). Lightweight probabilistic deep networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Gennatas, E. D., Friedman, J. H., Ungar, L. H., et al. (2020). Expert-augmented machine learning. Proceedings of

the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

Gervasi, V., Brøseth, H., Gimenez, O., Nilsen, E. B., et al. (2016). Sharing data improves monitoring of trans-

boundary populations: The case of wolverines in central Scandinavia. Wildlife Biology.

Gholami, S., Ford, B., Kar, D., Fang, F., et al. (2019). Wildlife poaching forecasting based on ranger-collected data

and evaluation. In Artificial Intelligence for Wildlife Conservation.

Glendinning, M. (2003). The conservation movement: A cult of the modern age. Transactions of the Royal Historical

Society.

Gonza, K. G. (2019). Assessment of records management practices at Uganda Wildlife Authority, Kampala.

https://asbatlibrary.s3.amazonaws.com

Gouvêa, T. S., Kath, H., Troshani, I., Luers, B., Serafini, P. P., et al. (2023). Interactive machine learning solutions

for acoustic monitoring of animal wildlife in biosphere reserves. https://repositorio.icmbio.gov.br

Gurumurthy, S., Yu, L., Zhang, C., Jin, Y., Li, W., et al. (2018). Exploiting data and human knowledge for predicting

wildlife poaching. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable

Societies.

Hao, S., Hu, P., Zhao, P., Hoi, S. C. H., & Miao, C. (2018). Online active learning with expert advice. ACM

Transactions on Information Systems.

Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data.

Communication Methods and Measures.

Holub, A., Perona, P., & Burl, M. C. (2008). Entropy-based active learning for object recognition. In 2008 IEEE

Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.

Jagannathan, P., Saravanan, K., Deepajothi, S., et al. (2025). Federated learning and blockchain- based collaborative

framework for real-time wildlife monitoring. Cybernetics and Information Technologies.

Kakooza, A. C. (2021). Data collection and management in the COVID-19 era: A legal analysis of Ugandan

legislation. The Uganda Living Law Journal.

Katswera, J., Mutekanga, N. M., & Twesigye, C. K. (2022). The influence of long-term wildlife monitoring on policy

development to conserve biodiversity in Uganda. ResearchGate.

Khaemba, W. M., & Stein, A. (2002). Improved sampling of wildlife populations using airborne surveys. Wildlife

Research.

Le Folgoc, L., Baltatzis, V., Desai, S., Devaraj, A., (2021). Is MC dropout Bayesian? arXiv Preprint,

arXiv:2110.04286.

Manjula, V. S., & Tadesse B. (2023). Web Technology. Scientific International Publishing House, 1st edition.

https://sipinternationalpublishers.com/product-detail.php?PID=MjQw

Milanés-Hermosilla, D., Trujillo Codorniú, R.,(2021). Monte Carlo dropout for uncertainty estimation and

motor imagery classification. Sensors.

Mitterwallner, V., Peters, A., Edelhoff, H., (2024). Automated visitor and wildlife monitoring with camera traps and

machine learning. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

Monarch, R. M. (2021). Human-in-the-loop machine learning: Active learning and annotation for human-centered

AI. https://books.google.com

Mukobi, G., Chatain, P., Fong, S., Windesheim, R., (2023). SuperHF: Supervised iterative learning from human

feedback. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2310.16763.

Norouzzadeh, M. S., Morris, D., Beery, S., et al. (2021). A deep active learning system for species identification and

counting in camera trap images. Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

Raj, A., & Bach, F. (2022). Convergence of uncertainty sampling for active learning. In Proceedings of the

International Conference on Machine Learning.

Shi, L., Copot, C., & Vanlanduit, S. (2022). Evaluating dropout placements in Bayesian regression ResNet. Journal

of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research.

Sun, C. C., Hurst, J. E., & Fuller, A. K. (2021). Citizen science data collection for integrated wildlife population

analyses. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

Tuia, D., Kellenberger, B., Beery, S., Costelloe, B. R. (2022). Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife

conservation. Nature Communications.

Wang, P., Bouaynaya, N. C., Mihaylova, L.,(2020). Bayesian neural networks uncertainty quantification with cubature

rules. In Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

Zhang, C., & Zhang, J. (2023). DJAN: Deep joint adaptation network for wildlife image recognition. Animals.

Zhou, T., Zhang, J., & Tsang, D. H. K. (2023). Mode connectivity and data heterogeneity of federated learning. arXiv

Preprint, arXiv:2309.16935

Published
2026-06-12
How to Cite
Habib Shehu, Sajid Saleem, Vaithiyalingam Subramanian Manjula, & Isa Ismail Ibrahim. (2026). Hybrid Expert-Augmented Active Learning for Enhanced Electronic Records Management in Uganda’s Wildlife Sector. Interdisciplinary Journal Of Lifelong Learning, 2(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.52968/15605907